If anybody is interested, I just compiled Putty for below systems:
- Windows x64 (CLI & GUI),
- Linux x86 (CLI & GUI-GTK),
- Linux x64 (CLI & GUI-GTK),
- Linux ARMv7 (CLI & GUI-GTK),
- Linux ARMv5 (CLI Only).
- Linux ARMv5 (CLI Only).
All builds feature Linker-time optimizations with Linker Plugin (except ARMv5), are static.
ARMv7 build is NEON FPU optimised, built on Odroid U3.
ARMv5 was built on Zyxel NSA-220 (oarm, uClibc).
CLI & GUI builds contain: fuzzterm, pageant, plink, pscp, psftp, pterm, putty, puttygen, puttytel.
CLI only builds contain: fuzzterm, plink, pscp, psftp, puttygen.
ARMv7 build is NEON FPU optimised, built on Odroid U3.
ARMv5 was built on Zyxel NSA-220 (oarm, uClibc).
CLI & GUI builds contain: fuzzterm, pageant, plink, pscp, psftp, pterm, putty, puttygen, puttytel.
CLI only builds contain: fuzzterm, plink, pscp, psftp, puttygen.
I know it's kind of pointless to have Putty on Linux but hey, maybe someone is so used to operate it on Windows he/she is willing to have it on Linux as well. :)
Windows x86 builds are available on the official site, so I'm not compiling those.
Here it is: http://virtual.4my.eu/putty
Why should You care for x64 builds? Well, if You run x64 system usually x64 builds should be faster on those systems. With putty it should make a difference when using tunnels to transfer large amounts of data or copying files with other tools provided. I didn't make any comparison charts myself, but if You care to do them, You can share the information. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment